Make a structuralist analysis of a film or films of your choice. As Essay

Make a structuralist analysis of a film or films of your choice. As crack up of your analysis discuss the type of structuralist analysis you are development - Essay ExampleFor that reason, this essay will focus on the work of Akira Kurosawa.Anyone who has been to the movies might have noticed that as you leave, there is a lot of life history in the people as they talk about the movie they saw. Often times, as people leave a movie, they seem quite happy. We can allot this happiness to having been entertained, but it probably goes beyond just entertainment. Especially in the first few moments following the viewing of a movie, people seem to be still involved in the film in a very noticeable way. Then, perhaps a little after the feelings have somewhat subsided and theyre moving around again in their own lives. For 90 minutes or more prior they had suspended their disbelief and become a part of the film they were watching.1 For the period of the film and for perhaps a brief time foll owing it, the attestator has had an find out of, . . . self-development, identification, catharsis and insight.2 The film experience allows the viewer to experience the challenge of action, to be a hero or heroine, to feel that first love again, to fulfill dreams and ambitions. If we are to consider the interaction of the viewer in the film, as the viewer relates to the characters, as the viewer fulfills fantasy, dreams and daydreams the term entertainment then takes on an enlarged meaning.In considering the film watching experience, similarities between that experience and the experience of a dream can be found. For instance, the individual sense of seeing the picture on the screen from afar, and the sense of fulfillment that comes from having viewed action or heroism, for instance, is not so different than dreams that evolve to be worked out on the stage of the minds subconscious and as viewed by the minds eye. The last-ditch personal benefit of film and dreaming are therefore very similar